Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs IUX, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Trading 212 vs IUX: Trading 212 was founded in 2004, while IUX launched in 2016. Neither broker is publicly traded or a bank; both operate as online brokers.
Regulation and trust: Trading 212 holds three Tier-1 licenses and no Tier-2 licenses. IUX holds one Tier-1 and one Tier-2 license. On the ForexBrokers.com Trust Score (out of 99), Trading 212 scores 82 (trusted) and IUX scores 76 (average risk). For context, 90–99 is highly trusted, 80–89 trusted, 70–79 average risk, 60–69 high risk, and under 59 not trusted.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2016 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
Trading 212 and IUX both keep commissions and fees fairly simple, but the cost picture is different for each broker. Trading 212’s CFD account advertises zero commission, yet traders still pay spreads on CFDs and forex. Its published average EUR/USD spread of 2.7 pips in April 2025 is relatively high, which can make it less attractive for cost-conscious forex traders. Trading 212 earns 4 out of 5 stars for commissions and fees and ranks #28 out of 36 brokers.
IUX offers more account choices, including spread-only and commission-based options, which gives traders more flexibility depending on how often they trade. Its Standard and Standard+ accounts start with a $10 minimum deposit, while the Raw and Pro accounts are aimed at active traders with a $500 minimum deposit. IUX lists stronger pricing overall, with average EUR/USD spreads around 0.7 pips on the Pro account and about 0.9 pips on the Standard account, while the Raw account adds a $6 commission per 100,000 units. IUX is rated 4.5 out of 5 stars for commissions and fees and is ranked #19 out of 36 brokers.
Overall, IUX has the edge on pricing for most traders, especially those looking for tighter spreads. Trading 212 may appeal to users who want a simple zero-commission message, but its wider spreads can increase trading costs. If low forex and CFD fees are a priority, IUX is the stronger option of the two.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $50 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 0.86 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | 0.6 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Join 239,000+ traders worldwide.
When it comes to range of investments, Trading 212 offers a much wider choice than IUX. Trading 212 provides access to 13,000 tradeable symbols and 180 forex pairs, compared with IUX’s 152 symbols and 34 forex pairs. Both brokers offer forex as CFDs or spot contracts, and both let clients trade international exchange-listed shares. However, Trading 212 also supports exchange-traded U.S. stocks, while IUX does not.
Trading 212 also has an edge in crypto investing, since it lets clients buy actual cryptocurrency as well as crypto CFDs, while IUX only offers crypto CFDs. Neither broker offers copy trading. Based on the available market range, Trading 212 is rated 5 stars and ranked #15 out of 36 brokers by ForexBrokers.com, while IUX is rated 3.5 stars and ranked #36, making Trading 212 the stronger pick for investors who want more variety.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 13000 | 152 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 180 | 34 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Trading 212 and IUX both give traders a web-based platform and a free demo account for simulated trading, so each broker makes it easy to practice before risking real money. Both also let you place trades directly from a chart, which can be helpful if you want to react quickly to price moves. That said, Trading 212 does not offer a desktop download platform, while IUX does, giving IUX an edge for people who prefer a Windows app. IUX also offers a built-in platform of its own and supports MetaTrader 5, while Trading 212 does not offer either of those options.
In overall trading tools, Trading 212 has the stronger rating, with 4 out of 5 stars for Trading Platforms and Tools and a ForexBrokers.com ranking of #19 out of 36 brokers. IUX is rated 3.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #36 out of 36. Neither broker supports copy trading or MetaTrader 4, and both appear to have charting and watch list features, though the exact indicator and field counts were not provided. For traders who want a simpler browser setup, either broker may work, but IUX offers more platform choices, while Trading 212 scores higher overall for platform and tools quality.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 102 | 106 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Trading 212 and IUX both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, so traders can manage accounts on the go with either broker. In terms of app features, Trading 212 has the edge for everyday usability because it includes stock and forex price alerts, watchlist symbol syncing, and the ability to draw trendlines on charts. IUX also supports auto-saving chart drawings, but it does not offer price alerts, watchlist syncing, or trendline tools in its mobile app.
When it comes to charting, IUX lists slightly more technical studies than Trading 212, with 106 compared with 104. Even so, Trading 212 scores higher overall for mobile trading apps, earning 4 out of 5 stars and ranking #17 out of 36 brokers on ForexBrokers.com. IUX is rated 3.5 stars and ranks #36 out of 36, making Trading 212 the stronger choice for traders who want a more complete mobile app experience.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | No |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 106 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | No |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When it comes to market research, Trading 212 has a slight edge over IUX. Neither broker offers daily market commentary, Autochartist, Trading Central, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading tools, and both provide an economic calendar for tracking major global news events. The key difference is that Trading 212 includes forex news from top-tier sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, and Dow Jones, while IUX does not.
Trading 212 also offers a sentiment tool that shows the balance of long and short positions, which can help traders gauge market mood, while IUX does not. This gives Trading 212 a stronger research offering overall, reflected in its 3.5-star Research rating and #33 ranking out of 36 brokers, compared with IUX at 3 stars and #36.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
For beginners looking for educational support, Trading 212 has the edge over IUX. Both brokers offer at least 10 beginner-friendly trading videos, and neither provides online educational webinars at least once a month. However, Trading 212 goes further with at least 10 advanced educational videos, while IUX does not meet that mark. In addition, Trading 212 is rated 3.5 out of 5 for Education and ranks #20 out of 36 brokers in the ForexBrokers.com Education category, compared with IUX’s 3 out of 5 rating and #36 ranking.
When it comes to forex or CFDs learning materials, neither broker is shown here as clearly meeting the requirement for at least 10 education pieces focused mainly on forex or CFDs. Even so, Trading 212 appears to offer a stronger overall learning experience for new traders, thanks to its wider range of video content and better Education score. IUX still provides beginner-level videos, but its lower rating and bottom-ranked Education placement suggest it may be less helpful for someone who wants more guidance as they learn.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than IUX. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25, while IUX finished with an overall rank of #36.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 82 | 76 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Trading 212 lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency and trade cryptocurrency CFDs, whereas IUX does not offer delivered cryptocurrency and only provides crypto CFDs.
Trading 212 vs IUX: for deposits and withdrawals, Trading 212 supports ACH/SEPA and bank wires but not PayPal or Skrill, while IUX supports Skrill and bank wires, lacks ACH/SEPA and PayPal, and Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified for either.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 82 | 76 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | IUX Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| Regulation | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 82 | 76 | |
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2016 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | No | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | No | ||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | No |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | No | ||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) | No |
| Investments | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 13000 | 152 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 180 | 34 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 0.86 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | 0.6 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | Yes | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | No | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $50 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 102 | 106 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | No |
| Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 106 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | No |
| Research | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
| Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | IUX Review |
| Overall | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 82 | 76 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | IUX Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
Capital.com
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill