Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs IFC Markets, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Trading 212 (founded 2004) and IFC Markets (founded 2006) are online brokers that are not publicly traded and are not banks. Based on ForexBrokers.com’s Trust Score, Trading 212 scores 82/99 (trusted, 80–89), while IFC Markets scores 73/99 (average risk, 70–79). For context: 90–99 is highly trusted, 60–69 is high risk, and below 59 should not be trusted.
On regulation, Trading 212 holds three Tier-1 licenses (considered highly trusted by ForexBrokers.com) and zero Tier-2 licenses. IFC Markets holds one Tier-1 license and zero Tier-2 licenses.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2006 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 5 |
When comparing commissions and fees, Trading 212 and IFC Markets both earn 4 out of 5 stars, but Trading 212 ranks higher overall for this category. ForexBrokers.com places Trading 212 at #28 out of 36 brokers, while IFC Markets sits at #33 out of 36. Trading 212 promotes zero-commission trading on its CFD account, but traders still pay the spread on CFDs and forex. Its April 2025 average EUR/USD spread was 2.7 pips, which is well above the industry average and makes it less competitive on price.
IFC Markets is also not the lowest-cost option, with an average EUR/USD spread of 1.44 pips versus the industry average of 1.08 pips. Even so, it can be a better fit for active traders because its new ECN account has an effective spread of about 1.1 pips after including the 0.005% commission on both sides of a trade. IFC Markets also stands out for having no inactivity fee and offering active trader discounts, which may help reduce overall trading costs.
In simple terms, Trading 212 may appeal to beginners looking for straightforward pricing, while IFC Markets could be more attractive to frequent traders who want access to its ECN account and possible discounts. Still, both brokers land in the same star-rating tier for commissions and fees, and neither is among the most affordable choices in this category.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 1.44 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | 1.1 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Join 239,000+ traders worldwide.
Trading 212 offers a wider range of investments than IFC Markets, with 13,000 tradeable symbols compared with 630. It also gives access to more forex pairs, with 180 available versus 49 at IFC Markets. Both brokers support forex trading as either a CFD or spot contract, so traders can choose between the two markets on each platform.
When it comes to shares and crypto, Trading 212 has the edge for variety and flexibility. It lets clients buy exchange-traded U.S. shares and international shares, and it also offers both actual cryptocurrency and crypto CFDs. IFC Markets allows international exchange-traded shares and crypto CFDs, but not U.S.-listed shares or direct crypto ownership. IFC Markets does offer copy trading, which Trading 212 does not. Overall, Trading 212 is rated 5 stars for Range of Investments and ranks #15 out of 36 brokers, while IFC Markets is rated 3.5 stars and ranks #32.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 13000 | 630 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 180 | 49 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Trading 212 and IFC Markets both give traders a web-based platform and a free demo account for paper trading, so each is easy to try before risking real money. Both also let you place trades straight from a chart, which can make buying and selling feel quicker and simpler. On overall Trading Platforms and Tools scores, both brokers are rated 4 out of 5 stars, but Trading 212 is ranked higher by ForexBrokers.com at #19 out of 36 brokers, compared with IFC Markets at #30.
The bigger difference is in platform choice. Trading 212 does not offer a desktop download platform, a proprietary trading platform, copy trading, MT4, or MT5, while IFC Markets does offer all of those options, including its own in-house platform and Windows desktop software. That makes IFC Markets the stronger pick for traders who want more platform variety and access to popular third-party tools, while Trading 212 may suit those who prefer a simpler, browser-based setup.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 102 | 30 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Trading 212 and IFC Markets both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, along with stock and forex price alerts, watchlist syncing, trendline drawing, and auto-saving chart drawings. In other words, both platforms cover the core features most traders want when managing trades on the go. Each broker also earns a 4-star rating for mobile trading apps, so neither one falls behind on the basics.
The main difference shows up in charting tools. Trading 212 gives mobile users 104 technical studies, while IFC Markets offers 30. That wider range can make Trading 212 more appealing for traders who rely on chart analysis in the app. This is reflected in ForexBrokers.com’s rankings too, where Trading 212 places #17 out of 36 brokers for Mobile Trading Apps, compared with IFC Markets at #35.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When comparing Trading 212 and IFC Markets for market research, both brokers offer a similar set of tools, and each is rated 3.5 out of 5 stars for Research. They both provide a sentiment-based trading tool and an economic calendar, which can help traders follow market mood and track major global events. Neither broker offers research from Autochartist, Trading Central, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading.
The main difference is in news and commentary. Trading 212 includes forex news from top-tier sources such as Bloomberg, Reuters, and Dow Jones, while IFC Markets does not. On the other hand, IFC Markets offers daily market commentary, which Trading 212 does not. In ForexBrokers.com’s Research ranking, IFC Markets places slightly higher at #31 out of 36 brokers, compared with Trading 212 at #33.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Trading 212 and IFC Markets both give beginners a fair amount of learning support, especially through video content. Each broker offers at least 10 beginner-friendly videos and at least 10 advanced videos, so new traders and more experienced users can find material that fits their level. Neither broker offers monthly online educational webinars, and neither one appears to meet the standard for forex or CFDs education that requires at least 10 pieces focused mainly on those topics.
In third-party ratings, both brokers score 3.5 out of 5 stars for Education, which suggests a similar overall experience for learners. However, Trading 212 ranks a bit higher in ForexBrokers.com’s Education category, placing #20 out of 36 brokers, while IFC Markets comes in at #25. For beginners who want clear, easy-to-follow videos, both are comparable, but Trading 212 has a slight edge in the ranking.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than IFC Markets. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25, while IFC Markets finished with an overall rank of #34.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 82 | 73 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Trading 212 vs IFC Markets: the online broker Trading 212 lets you buy real (delivered) cryptocurrency and trade cryptocurrency CFDs, while IFC Markets supports only cryptocurrency CFDs and does not offer the purchase of actual crypto.
Comparing online brokers Trading 212 and IFC Markets on deposit and withdrawal methods: Trading 212 supports ACH/SEPA and bank wire transfers, while IFC Markets does not support ACH/SEPA but does support bank wires; neither broker offers PayPal or Skrill, and Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified for either.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 82 | 73 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| Regulation | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 82 | 73 | |
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2006 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | ||
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 5 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | ||
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | ||
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | ||
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | ||
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | ||
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | ||
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | ||
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | ||
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | No | ||
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | ||
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 13000 | 630 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 180 | 49 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 1.44 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | 1.1 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 102 | 30 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | Trading 212 | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 82 | 73 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
Capital.com
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill