Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of FP Markets vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
FP Markets (founded 2005) and Trading 212 (founded 2004) are online brokers that are not publicly traded and are not banks. Both cater to retail traders and investors, offering services without the backing of a listed parent company or banking charter.
Regulation is a key difference: FP Markets holds 2 Tier-1 licenses and 1 Tier-2 license, while Trading 212 holds 3 Tier-1 licenses and no Tier-2 licenses. ForexBrokers.com assigns FP Markets a Trust Score of 90/99 and Trading 212 an 82/99. On this scale, 90–99 is highly trusted, 80–89 trusted, 70–79 average risk, 60–69 high risk, and 59 or less should not be trusted. In short, FP Markets is rated highly trusted, and Trading 212 is rated trusted.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2005 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
FP Markets is the cheaper choice for many active traders, especially on its commission-based Raw ECN account. It offers tight spreads and low trading costs on MetaTrader and cTrader, with Raw ECN pricing averaging 0.1 pips before commission and about 0.8 pips all-in on EUR/USD. FP Markets also gets a 4.5-star rating and ranks #11 out of 36 brokers for Commissions and Fees, making it a strong pick for traders who want lower trading costs.
Trading 212 keeps things simple with zero-commission trading on its CFD account, but spreads still apply, and they can be wider than many competitors. In April 2025, its average EUR/USD spread was 2.7 pips, which is noticeably higher than the industry average and can make it more expensive for frequent traders. Trading 212 holds a 4-star rating and ranks #28 out of 36 for Commissions and Fees.
Overall, FP Markets offers better value if your main goal is lower commissions and tighter spreads, while Trading 212 may appeal to beginners who like a no-commission message and a simpler fee structure. If keeping forex and CFD trading costs down is the priority, FP Markets has the edge.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 AUD | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.3 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.9 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Join 239,000+ traders worldwide.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both let you trade forex as CFDs or spot contracts, but Trading 212 offers a wider selection overall. It lists about 13,000 tradeable symbols and 180 forex pairs, compared with FP Markets’ 10,000 symbols and 71 forex pairs. Trading 212 also stands out for investors who want access to real shares, since it supports exchange-traded securities on both U.S. and international stock markets. FP Markets does not offer these direct share purchases.
FP Markets does have copy trading, which Trading 212 does not, so it may suit traders who want to follow others. Both brokers offer cryptocurrency CFDs, but only Trading 212 lets clients buy actual cryptocurrency. Based on range of investments, Trading 212 is rated 5 stars and ranked #15 out of 36 brokers by ForexBrokers.com, while FP Markets is rated 4.5 stars and ranked #17.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 10000 | 13000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 71 | 180 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both give traders a free demo account, plus web-based platforms and the ability to trade directly from charts. Each broker is rated 4 out of 5 stars for trading platforms and tools, but Trading 212 holds a slightly higher spot in ForexBrokers.com’s rankings at #19 out of 36, compared with FP Markets at #22. This makes both options solid choices for traders who want easy access to markets and a user-friendly trading experience.
Where FP Markets pulls ahead is in platform choice and extra tools. It offers its own in-house platform, a Windows desktop download, copy trading, and support for both MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, while Trading 212 does not offer these options. Trading 212 still covers the basics well, especially for traders who prefer a simple browser-based setup, but FP Markets gives more flexibility for those who want more platform types and advanced trading features.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 102 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, along with price alerts, trendline drawing, and auto-saving chart drawings. Each broker is also rated 4 out of 5 stars for mobile trading apps, so both are solid choices for traders who want to manage positions on the go.
The main difference is in app features and sync. Trading 212 stands out because its watchlists sync between the mobile app and online account, which makes it easier to keep track of symbols across devices. It also offers 104 technical studies for charting, compared with FP Markets, which uses the default MetaTrader chart tools. In ForexBrokers.com’s mobile trading apps rankings, Trading 212 places higher at #17 out of 36 brokers, while FP Markets ranks #20.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | MetaTrader (Default) | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
FP Markets has the edge over Trading 212 for market research. It offers daily market commentary, while Trading 212 does not. FP Markets also gives traders access to tools from Autochartist and Trading Central, which can help with technical and fundamental analysis. Both brokers provide forex news from major sources, a sentiment tool that shows long and short positioning, and an economic calendar for key global events.
In independent ratings, FP Markets scores 4 out of 5 stars for Research and ranks #22 out of 36 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, compared with Trading 212’s 3.5 stars and #33 ranking. Neither broker offers research from TipRanks or Acuity Trading, so the main difference comes down to FP Markets’ wider selection of market commentary and analysis tools.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | Yes | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both give beginners a solid set of learning materials, including at least 10 beginner videos and 10 advanced videos each. They also both offer enough forex or CFDs education to meet the basic benchmark of 10 or more pieces focused on those topics. However, FP Markets has an edge for newcomers who want more live support, since it offers online educational client webinars at least once a month, while Trading 212 does not.
In overall education quality, FP Markets is rated 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #22 out of 36 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 is rated 3.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #20. Although Trading 212 places slightly higher in the ranking, FP Markets appears stronger for beginners who value a wider mix of learning options, especially regular webinars alongside its video and forex/CFD education content.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that FP Markets is better than Trading 212. FP Markets finished with an overall rank of #19, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
FP Markets shines as a low-cost broker for trading forex and CFDs – as long as you use the MetaTrader platform. The Iress platform suite offers well over 10,000 tradeable symbols, but it’s mostly a share trading platform – and is generally a much pricier option.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 90 | 82 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Comparing online brokers FP Markets vs Trading 212: Trading 212 lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency and also trade cryptocurrency CFDs, while FP Markets does not offer real crypto purchases and only provides cryptocurrency CFDs.
FP Markets vs Trading 212: For deposits and withdrawals, FP Markets supports PayPal and Skrill plus bank wire transfers but not ACH/SEPA, whereas Trading 212 supports ACH/SEPA and bank wire transfers but not PayPal or Skrill.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 90 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 90 | 82 | |
| Year Founded | 2005 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 10000 | 13000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 71 | 180 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.3 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.9 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | No | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 AUD | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | Yes | No |
| Trading Tools | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 102 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | MetaTrader (Default) | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | Yes | No | |
| Trading Central | Yes | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 90 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
Capital.com
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill