Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Exness vs IFC Markets, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Exness and IFC Markets are both online brokers that are privately held and not banks. Exness was founded in 2008, while IFC Markets began in 2006. Neither company is publicly traded on a stock exchange.
In terms of regulation, Exness holds 2 Tier-1 licenses and 3 Tier-2 licenses, compared with IFC Markets’ 1 Tier-1 license and no Tier-2 licenses. According to ForexBrokers.com, Exness has a Trust Score of 80/99, which places it in the “trusted” range (80–89). IFC Markets scores 73/99, which is considered “average risk” (70–79).
| Feature |
Exness
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2008 | 2006 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 1 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 3 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 3 | 5 |
Exness and IFC Markets both earn 4 out of 5 stars for commissions and fees, and the difference between them is small. Exness is ranked #32 out of 36 brokers for this category, while IFC Markets is ranked #33 out of 36. For traders who want lower costs, Exness may be the more flexible choice because pricing changes based on the account type. Its commission-free Standard Cent, Standard, and Pro accounts come with different spread levels, while its Zero Spread account charges $0.05 per trade and its Raw account charges up to $7 per round turn lot ($3.5 per side). In simple terms, Exness gives traders several ways to balance spread size and commission costs.
IFC Markets has a slightly less competitive pricing setup overall, with an average EUR/USD spread of 1.44, which is above the industry average of 1.08. However, active traders may find better value with its ECN account, where the effective spread is about 1.1 pips after the 0.005% commission on both sides of the trade. IFC Markets also stands out for not charging inactivity fees, and it offers active trader discounts, which can help reduce overall trading expenses for frequent users.
Overall, Exness offers more account choices and more ways to control trading costs, while IFC Markets may appeal to traders who value no inactivity fee and occasional discounts. If your main goal is the lowest possible spread or a wider range of fee structures, Exness has the edge. If you prefer a simpler fee setup and do not trade often, IFC Markets may still be worth considering.
| Feature |
Exness
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | $1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | N/A | 1.44 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | N/A | 1.1 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Join 239,000+ traders worldwide.
Exness and IFC Markets both give traders access to forex as CFDs or spot contracts, and both let you trade cryptocurrency CFDs rather than the actual coins. However, Exness offers a wider selection of forex pairs, with 78 available compared with IFC Markets’ 49. Exness also lists 239 tradeable symbols overall, while IFC Markets provides a larger menu of 630 symbols, which may appeal to traders looking for more market choices in general.
When it comes to other investment types, IFC Markets has the edge because it offers exchange-traded securities on international exchanges, while Exness does not. IFC Markets also supports copy trading, which Exness does not. Neither broker offers U.S.-listed share buying or direct cryptocurrency ownership. Both are rated 3.5 out of 5 stars for Range of Investments, though IFC Markets ranks slightly higher in the category at #32 out of 36 brokers, compared with Exness at #35.
| Feature |
Exness
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 239 | 630 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 78 | 49 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Exness and IFC Markets both give traders a wide range of platform choices, including free demo accounts, a proprietary platform, web-based trading, Windows desktop downloads, and access to both MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. Each also lets users place trades directly from charts, which can make order entry easier for active traders. In ForexBrokers.com’s Trading Platforms and Tools category, both brokers are rated 4 out of 5 stars, but Exness is ranked higher overall at #15 out of 36 brokers, while IFC Markets sits at #30.
The biggest difference is copy trading: IFC Markets offers it, while Exness does not. For traders who want to follow and mirror other investors, that may make IFC Markets more appealing. For those focused on platform variety and a higher category ranking, Exness has the edge. Since both brokers support paper trading and the main trading platforms most people look for, the better choice may come down to whether copy trading matters to you.
| Feature |
Exness
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 106 | 30 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Exness and IFC Markets both make it easy to trade on the go with iPhone and Android apps, plus helpful features like price alerts, watchlist syncing, and trendline drawing on charts. Both mobile apps are also rated 4 out of 5 stars for mobile trading, so each offers a solid experience for everyday traders who want access to their accounts from a phone or tablet.
The main difference is in chart tools and overall ranking. Exness offers 100 technical studies in its mobile app, compared with 30 at IFC Markets, which gives Exness more options for chart analysis. Exness is also ranked #18 out of 36 brokers for mobile trading apps by ForexBrokers.com, while IFC Markets is ranked #35. One advantage for IFC Markets is that its app auto-saves chart drawings, while Exness does not.
| Feature |
Exness
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 100 | 30 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | No | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Exness and IFC Markets are closely matched in market research, with both offering daily market commentary, an economic calendar, and a 3.5-star Research rating from ForexBrokers.com. In the rankings, Exness places #32 out of 36 brokers, while IFC Markets is slightly ahead at #31. Both brokers give traders the basic tools needed to track news events and keep up with market updates.
The main differences come down to the extra research features each one provides. Exness stands out for offering forex news from major sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, and Dow Jones, plus Trading Central tools such as Technical Analytics. IFC Markets does not offer those features, but it does include a sentiment tool that shows long and short positioning across instruments, which Exness does not provide. Neither broker offers Autochartist, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading research tools.
| Feature |
Exness
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Client sentiment data | No | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Exness and IFC Markets both give beginners a useful set of learning tools, with each offering at least 10 beginner videos and at least 10 advanced videos on trading topics. They also share the same Education rating from ForexBrokers.com at 3.5 out of 5 stars, which suggests that each broker offers a decent but not top-tier learning experience overall. In the Education category, Exness is ranked #21 out of 36 brokers, while IFC Markets sits a bit lower at #25, giving Exness a slight edge in this area.
Where Exness stands out more clearly is in forex and CFDs education and live learning support. Exness offers enough forex or CFDs learning material to meet the 10-piece minimum and also provides online educational webinars at least once a month, which can be especially helpful for new traders who want guided lessons. IFC Markets also meets the minimum for forex or CFDs education and offers both beginner and advanced videos, but it does not provide monthly educational webinars. For beginners who want more frequent live teaching, Exness is the stronger choice, while IFC Markets still gives solid self-paced video learning.
| Feature |
Exness
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Exness is better than IFC Markets. Exness finished with an overall rank of #31, while IFC Markets finished with an overall rank of #34.
Exness is a global forex broker best known for its flexible execution, instant withdrawals, and access to extremely high leverage, alongside multiple account types and a growing ecosystem of trading tools.
| Feature |
Exness
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 80 | 73 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Exness vs IFC Markets: neither broker offers buying actual (delivered) cryptocurrencies, but both provide cryptocurrency CFD trading.
Exness vs IFC Markets: Neither supports ACH/SEPA or PayPal, both accept bank wire transfers; Exness additionally supports Skrill while IFC Markets does not; Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified for either broker.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 73 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Exness Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| Regulation | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 80 | 73 | |
| Year Founded | 2008 | 2006 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | ||
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 1 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 3 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 3 | 5 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | ||
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | ||
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | ||
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | ||
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | ||
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | ||
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | ||
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | ||
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | ||
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) | Yes |
| Investments | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 239 | 630 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 78 | 49 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | N/A | 1.44 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | N/A | 1.1 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | $1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | No |
| Trading Platforms | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 106 | 30 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 100 | 30 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | Yes | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | No | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Exness Review |
| Overall | Exness | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 73 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Exness Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
Capital.com
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill